When the Philips researchers started to work on the VLP in
about 1970, almost immediately they came up with the idea to use the
same technology to record sound. The use of laser technology in particular
seemed an attractive prospect. The new way to play music would no longer
suffer from wear. Furthermore, in theory it would be possible to achieve
a better sound quality, in particular for the treble, for it is precisely
in rapid movements that the limitations of the needle of a record player
become apparent.
It started off as a modest project. The similarities with the VLP
meant that the idea could be worked on with relatively little effort.
The research group at Philips Research Laboratories consisted of only
two men: Loek Boonstra and Toon van Alem.
The audio version of the VLP would be able to benefit from the new
technology that had been developed for the video disc. Perhaps it would
even be possible to use the same player. In this way, an attractive
new medium could be developed in the footsteps of the VLP. In order
to highlight the similarities, the new sound medium was soon named Audio
Long Play (ALP).
For a long time it was precisely this conscious use of analogies
with the VLP that prevented the launch of a new sound medium. It started
with the idea that the VLP and the ALP should resemble each other externally.
This was beneficial from a marketing point of view. It meant there would
be no need for an additional item of equipment in the living room to
replace the record player. The idea was studied, but the market opportunities
were considered to be poor. An ALP with an average diameter of thirty
centimeters, the same size as the VLP and the LP, would be able to hold
dozens of hours of music. Which consumer would want that? And what record
company would want to sell so much music on just one disc? An ALP that
is as big as a VLP would have the survival chances of a dinosaur. Such
an audio disc would collapse under the weight of the colossal playing
time.
Lou Ottens, technical director of the audio division at Philips,
was one of the first to take the logical step. He realized that this
dilemma could only be solved by reducing the size of the ALP. With hindsight,
this might seem an insignificant idea, but it meant more direct competition
with the unassailable success of the black vinyl.
Lou Ottens worked as a member of the management team of the audio
division itself and therefore not at Philips Research Laboratories.
The small group of researchers who were carrying out research into the
ALP at Philips Research Laboratories were however on the payroll of
the audio division. Without the vision that Ottens put forward, the
CD would never have come into being. He realized that the music that
was currently being brought out on LP would soon have to be made available
on an ALP. The playing time therefore had to be approximately one hour,
Ottens thought. The diameter of the new audio disc would then have to
be about 10 centimeters because, above all, the ALP had to be more practical
and convenient than the gramophone record. Ottens was fanatical when
it came to user-friendliness. After all, he had been closely involved
in the development of the Compact Cassette in the sixties. And within
Philips he frequently became angry about clumsy consumer products.
The smaller ALP would still be able to benefit from technical analogies
with the VLP. By using the same coding technique, much of the electronics
would be the same in the two types of equipment. Furthermore, the coding
technique tied in surprisingly well with a new trend that was emerging
in the seventies: quadraphony. At that time, broadcasting corporations
were starting to broadcast music with four-channel sound, giving a more
complete reproduction than stereo broadcasts. Two speakers in front
of the listener and two behind together created the sensation of being
in a concert hall.
It turned out that quadraphony could be recorded much more effectively
on an ALP than on an LP. After all, different signals had to be combined
on the VLP in order to record video images. The combination of four
separate sound channels was therefore well within the possibilities.
Quadraphony would give the ALP something more than the LP, for the quadraphonic
version of the LP had to make the most of the possibilities created
by the two sides of a groove. The two additional channels for quadraphony
could only be put on an LP using a number of technical tricks — with
only moderate results.
With these thoughts in mind, work on the ALP was continued by a team
that now comprised four researchers at Philips Research Laboratories.
For the time being it remained a project of modest scope. In 1974 the
first prototype of an ALP was ready to be shown to a number of insiders.
Gradually it became clear that quadraphony did not provide the opportunities
that had been hoped for. A disc with one hour of four-channel music
would need to have a diameter of 20 centimeters, i.e. larger than the
requirements set by Ottens. Furthermore, the quadraphonic trend did
not really take off. The ALP therefore had to become stereo, just like
the LP. The medium would only be able to distinguish itself from the
black vinyl by its compactness and superior sound quality.
At the first demonstrations the actual sound quality was disappointing.
The use of contactless laser scanning meant that there was no scratching
or ticking noise from a needle. However, the music reproduction was
hampered by crackle and creak.
This was caused by the coding technique used. As a result of errors
that occurred during the pressing of the disc, it was difficult for
the laser to follow the pit track. This did not really matter when video
images were being reproduced because the eye is too slow to notice if
there is a picture line missing. However, if the music is missing for
a moment, the ear detects that straight away. The technology that had
been borrowed from the VLP therefore proved ultimately not to be suitable
for sound.
It was not only the imperfections in the surface that caused trouble
for the ALP. The use of analog coding on the disc meant there was a
direct relation between the way in which the sound was played back and
the quality of the sound. Irregularities in the number of revolutions
are translated directly into variations in the pitch, just as in the
case of the LP. When the signal is amplified, the ALP suffers just as
much from noise as the LP. As a result, the ALP had little more to offer
than the LP.
Now it was clear that the required sound quality could not be achieved
using the analog technology, new coding techniques had to be found.
A number of technological analogies with the video disc had now disappeared.
Would the ALP be able to make it alone now that the technological choices
that had been developed for the VLP could no longer be followed? The
development team, which had just been expanded by the addition of a
fifth person, would have to grow substantially in order to research
the new digital techniques. This would cause the development costs to
rise sharply.
Ottens had a slightly unusual approach to costs: if you can just
manage to sell enough products, ultimately it is only the material costs
that count. He referred to this as the first law of consumer electronics
(the second related to introduction on the market). The thing to do,
he thought, was to make the ALP as compact as possible so that it did
not require much material at all. He predicted two developments that
would make the player even smaller. Until then extensive electronics
had been required for the ALP, but new technologies were emerging which
would enable many components to be integrated on one piece of silicon.
The second development related to a new type of laser. Endeavours
to manufacture lasers with semiconductors instead of large gas tubes
had met with success. The first attempts to make compact solid-state
lasers date back to the seventies. The structures that were required
to achieve the laser effect were etched away in a small piece of material
comparable with a chip. These first prototypes were not very successful.
They worked for a few seconds and then after that the material became
too hot and burst apart.
Piet Kramer, head of the optical group, did not therefore hold out
much hope for the solid-state laser. Ottens had great hopes that progress
would continue to be made in the improvement of the laser and the miniaturization
of electronics. At that time the components in question were still fairly
exotic. ‘But a solid state laser is such a tiny piece of material. It
can’t be expensive. There is nothing in it that is really expensive,’
thought Ottens. He viewed the expensive optical system in the ALP players
in the same straightforward way. It is made of glass, nothing more than
that. The expensive research and complex machinery no longer count in
mass production. What matters then is what material you use.
Ottens calculated that it need not cost any more than 150 guilders
(about 75 Euros) to produce an ALP player — that was less than most
record players cost at that time. Looking back, it is clear that his
estimate was on the conservative side. Now, almost a quarter of a century
later, the production costs of some CD players amount to no more than
a few dozen guilders.
In 1977, Ottens managed to generate great enthusiasm amongst Philips’
senior management with his calculations. What had until then been a
small project, which had followed in the tracks of the video disc, now
became an independent one. A separate development lab was set up for
the sound disc within the audio division. Joop van Tilburg, who had
then just been appointed general manager of the audio division, felt
that the product should therefore be given a new name. There were a
number of different proposals: Minirack, Mini Disc, Compact Rack, but
it was to be Compact Disc, for Van Tilburg wanted it to remind people
of the success of the Compact Cassette. This brought the CD out of the
shadow of its predecessor, the video disc.